文献综述、外文文献
题 目 县级绩效评估存在的
问题及完善
姓 名 王 宁
学 号 403010201223
学 院 公共管理学院
专 业 行 政 管 理
指导教师 高 艳
2007年 5 月 10 日
县级绩效评估存在的问题及完善
参考文献综述
4030102012 王宁
绩效评估是对其自身的管理及行为的成效的测量、考核和总结，目的是提高管理的绩效。绩效评估体现管理追求公众满意、服务公众、公共责任与公众效益的一种管理理念。绩效评估成为管理发展的必然方向。县级管理的模式需要创新，县级的绩效评估也在积极探索中进行。我国对绩效评估工作，起始于干部人事制度。随着党提出科学发展观和正确政绩观，各地和部门积极探索绩效评估，形成了各具特色的模式。目前，许多学者在这方面进行了研究。
关于县级绩效评估方面：
①刘虎其、杨畅在《县级管理引入绩效评估模式的难点和对策分析》中分析了将绩效评估模式引入到县级管理中的必要性，县级管理模式创新的紧迫性已为理论界和实践界所认同，绩效评估模式是从西方工业管理学中引入到管理中来的,面对县级管理中所存在的问题,针对其难点试图来提出对策。
②张劲松的《县级能力绩效评估的内涵、依据及其模型》，对县级能力开展绩效评估有着三方面的理论依据,而在实践中需要建构一种基于绩效评估过程的有利于县级能力提升的组织运行模式,这种模式的运行能推动县级以绩效评估为核心的行政绩效的变革。
③彭国甫在《推进县级管理模式创新》提出了当前县级在管理中存在的一些问题，对县级进行绩效评估，并以次为切入点来促进机构的改革，对县级的绩效评估具有重要的意义。
④蒋意桥的《地方绩效考核价值取向及评价标准的完善》对地方在绩效评估取得的成就和存在的问题进行了分析，对地方的价值取向和评估指标方面的改善进行了探索和总结。
通过对县级地方绩效评估中存在的问题进行研究，找出我国县级绩效评估存在的问题，并且针对县级的特点进行分析，对存在的问题进行改善，使县级的绩效评估更加规范化。探索建立适合我国国情的地方绩效考核，使考核方式规范化，合理化，推动地方积极实施绩效评估，更好地发挥地方的社会服务职能，实现行政的高效率。
参考文献：
[1] 邱霈恩.落实科学发展观须调整绩效导向[N].人民日报,2004-02-16(9).
[2] 胡税根,汪菁,(韩)朴钟权.韩国绩效评估及其评价[J].甘肃行政学院学报,2006,(4)．
[3] 部门绩效评估研究报告[EB/OL].
http://www.sxhbao.com/Lunwen/Shxlw/Shxzh/55134.html.2007-05-07.
[4] 陈振明.公共管理学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003.
[5] 张勤.政绩观的扭曲与绩效评估的推进[J].公共行政[J],2007,(4).
[6] 胡税根.韩国绩效评估制度给我们的启示.江西行政学院学报[J],2004,(1).
[7] 蒋意桥.地方绩效考核价值取向及评价标准的完善[J].哈尔滨商业大学学报(社会科学版),2006,(3).
[8] 彭国甫.推进县级管理模式创新[J].公共行政[J],2007,(4).
[9] 刘虎其,杨畅.县级管理引入绩效评估模式的难点和对策分析[J].湖南行政学院学报,2004,(1).
[10] 倪星,余凯.论中国绩效评估制度的创新.政治学研究[J],2004,(3).
[11] 王爱冬.绩效评估主体多元化及其在中国的构建[J].河北学刊,2006,(6)．
[12] 卓越.公共部门绩效评估的主体构建[J].中国行政管理,2004,(5)．
[13] 王伟.论我国公民作为绩效评估的主体.沧桑[J],2006,(2)．
[14] 2004年中国网站绩效评估报告
[15] 黄寅德,吴妤.我国绩效评估与绩效文化的构建.行政与法[J],2007,(3)．
[16] 张劲松.县级能力绩效评估的内涵、依据及其模型.理论导刊[J],2006,(6).
[17] Lu Gang. The Problem of local authority Performance Appraisal and Improvement Measure. 2004.
[18] Richard, D. M.J.Smith. Governance and public policy in the United kingdom, New York: Oxford University press.2002,26
县级绩效评估存在的问题及完善
外文参考文献
403010201223 王宁
The Problem of local authority Performance Appraisal
and Improvement Measure
Lu Gang
Performance measurement of government is an important theories problem, and is a very important realistic problem too. It has many functions that can't be replaced, in appreciating the government’s ability, improving government’s performance, supervising government’s behavior, improving relation of government and society public etc. Since the 70's of 20 centuries, along with the enhance of all countries government’scost-consciousness and the citizen’s inspecting- consciousness, the performance measurement of government were given of big value and suffered with the favor. It was booming up used as an important political activity in the developed countries, and became an important measure that adopt quickly and widely in the reformation of the western government.
In the last few years, along with the continuous administration reforms of our country and the improving in the level of the government management, the some local governments already started with the trial of the government performance measurement. It had obtained the certain results, and made some positive effects. These practices proved that the performance measurement of government has got the extensive need in our local governments and other public sections. However, because our country is in the period of the new system instead of the old system, the some original irregularities of the old system still have very big inertial. This kind of inertial affected the fulfillment of performance measurement of local government, made some of them exposed a serious problems in theirs process of practice. Because performance measurement of the local government is still stated in the stage in start, and because we don’t have enough experiences that make the problem of the local government performance evaluation unavoidable. This paper point out problems of our local government performance measurement.
On this foundation, the article analysis the substance and course of these problems from viewpoints of the pubic administration, the politics science, economics and sociology, and put forward the strategies that concentrate on finding a developing path for performance measurement of local government, which keep it with state of the our country and the concrete local circumstance closely. The thesis starts from the theories analysis of performance measurement of government, giving a definition of it, proceed to explain its realistic meaning from the widespread meaning; The next in order, take British and American as examples, introduce practices of the local government performance measurement in western countries and their experience, and give a brief evaluation to it; Again, the theories combines together with fulfillment, analyze condition and existent problems of performance measurement of local government in present; Finally, aim at the existent problems, regard the important thought of the" three representatives" as the guide, according to the principle that draw lessons from the experience of the western country and combine it with the state of our country together, inquiry into the concrete measures that push forward the development of performance measurement system of local government, to make it to head for the road that scientific, systemize, standardize, develop its functions well in the modernization of government management.
我国地方绩效评估存在的问题及改进对策
绩效评估，既是一个重要的理论问题，又是一个很重要的现实问题，它在评价能力、监督行为、提高部门绩效、改进公共部门与社会公众之间的关系等方面具有不可替代的作用。自 20 世纪 70 年代以来，随着各国成本意识的强化和公民监督意识的增强，绩效评估受到了极大的重视和青睐，绩效评估作为一项重大的政治活动在西方国家蓬勃展开，并迅速成为西方改革普遍采取的一项重要措施。
近几年，随着我国行政改革的不断深入和管理水平的不断提高，一些地方和部门已开始尝试进行绩效评估的实践活动，取得了一定的成效，起到了一些积极作用。实践证明，绩效评估在我国及其他公共部门领域有着广泛的需求。然而，由于我国正处于新旧的转轨时期，原有的旧的一些弊端，仍然具有很大的惯性，这种惯性影响到了地方绩效评估的实施，使得一些地方绩效评估在实践的过程中暴露出了严重的问题。且由于当前我国地方绩效评估尚处于起步阶段，经验的不足也使地方绩效评估的问题在所难免。
当前我国地方绩效评估存在的问题的基础上，要从行政学、政治学、经济学和社会学多学科交叉的角度对这些问题的实质及其成因给予分析，并提出了对策思考，致力于探索出一条适合我国国情和地方具体情况的绩效评估发展路径。
对绩效评估的理论分析入手，对绩效评估进行概念界定，并从普遍的意义上阐释了它的现实意义；以英美两国为例，介绍了西方国家地方绩效评估的实践及其经验，并进行了简要的评述；理论与实践相结合，分析当前我国地方绩效评估的状况及其存在的问题；对既存的问题，以“三个代表”的重要思想为指导，按照借鉴西方发达国家经验与我国的国情相结合的原则，探讨推进我国地方绩效评估体系建设的具体措施，以使我国的地方绩效评估实践走向规范化、系统化、科学化和制度化的道路，充分发挥其在管理现代化中的作用。下载本文
