视频1 视频21 视频41 视频61 视频文章1 视频文章21 视频文章41 视频文章61 推荐1 推荐3 推荐5 推荐7 推荐9 推荐11 推荐13 推荐15 推荐17 推荐19 推荐21 推荐23 推荐25 推荐27 推荐29 推荐31 推荐33 推荐35 推荐37 推荐39 推荐41 推荐43 推荐45 推荐47 推荐49 关键词1 关键词101 关键词201 关键词301 关键词401 关键词501 关键词601 关键词701 关键词801 关键词901 关键词1001 关键词1101 关键词1201 关键词1301 关键词1401 关键词1501 关键词1601 关键词1701 关键词1801 关键词1901 视频扩展1 视频扩展6 视频扩展11 视频扩展16 文章1 文章201 文章401 文章601 文章801 文章1001 资讯1 资讯501 资讯1001 资讯1501 标签1 标签501 标签1001 关键词1 关键词501 关键词1001 关键词1501 专题2001
Redischildrencannowreportamountofcopy-on-wr
2020-11-09 13:10:48 责编:小采
文档


This is one of this trivial changes in Redis that can make a big difference for users. Basically in the unstable branch I added some code that has the following effect, when running Redis on Linux systems: [32741] 19 Nov 12:00:55.019 * Bac

This is one of this trivial changes in Redis that can make a big difference for users. Basically in the unstable branch I added some code that has the following effect, when running Redis on Linux systems:

[32741] 19 Nov 12:00:55.019 * Background saving started by pid 391
[391] 19 Nov 12:01:00.663 * DB saved on disk
[391] 19 Nov 12:01:00.673 * RDB: 462 MB of memory used by copy-on-write

As you can see now the amount of additional memory used by the saving child is reported (it is also reported for AOF rewrite operations).

I think this is big news for users as instead to see us developers and other Redis experts handwaving about the amount of copy-on-write being proportional to number of write ops per second and time used to produce the RDB or AOF file, now they get a number :-)

# How it is obtained?

We use the /proc//smaps, so yes, this is Linux only.
Basically it is the sum of all the Private_Dirty entries in this file for the child process (actually you could measure it on the parent side and it is the same).

I verified that the number we obtain actually corresponds very well with the physical amount of memory consumed during a save, in different conditions, so I'm very confident we provide an accurate information.

# Why a number in the log file instead of an entry in the INFO output?

Because even before calling wait3() from the parent, as long as the child exits we no longer have this information. So to display this information in INFO we need some inter process communication to move this info from the child to the parent. Not rocket science but for now I avoided adding extra complexity. The current patch is trivial enough that we could backport it into 2.6 for the joy of many users:

https://github.com/antirez/redis/commit/3bfeb9c1a7044cd96c1bd77677dfe8b575c73c5f
https://github.com/antirez/redis/commit/49b5235100fc214468b608c1ba6cdbc320fa88

The log is produced at NOTICE level (so it is displayed by default). Comments

下载本文
显示全文
专题